I know you all don't care and I'm talking to a wall more likely than not. But for the people who do care I'ma just posting a link to something rather entertaining that should be able to... Entertain the masses while teaching them history
I've been cleaning up my wiki walls, this one is next. Basically I mean totally emptying them to keep it clean. Many posts to not meet the new post directive I have written, therefore, to assure that the walls are clean of the inferiors they must be purged.
"Uses Yamato to ram his enemies" or something meme you made, you might want to fetch that if you want to keep it in existence.
Due to numerous violations of the new post directive, the entire thread has been eliminated. The topic was not approved of, nor was the # of posts, quality of grammer and punctuation, accuracy, and a few others.
If you would prefer access to the new posting directive I can provide it to you. For an example, posts such as this one fall under "excessive use of space" as there has not been a reply to warrant it's existence, it and this thread would qualify for purging.
The fact that what you did is so insignificant, that despite your tank being shipped to multiple navies, non of them are being used. And the fact that you havent contributed to RP aside from making ships. And if you're not staying. Bye, you can leave now.
So let us assume the 155mm L/77 fires a projectile with 43mm diameter that weighs 15 kg at 9,000 m/s. Versus the 15.5cm/60 3rd Year Naval Gun, 155mm diameter, 55.86 kg ammunition, 900 (?) m/s, the 155mm L/77 *should be* credited with 16,978mm
So help me physics, if I ever see you trying to start up another one of your pointless arguments on one of my simplewarships mod posts again, not only will I destroy what little progress you've made here, I will lock you out of ever playing with the SimpleWarships mod. PERMANENTLY. Do NOT fill my mod posts with that kind of stuff; if you want to argue with me, you keep it here or else.
So which wee little scumbag thought it was a great idea to try and sign up for supremacy 1914 with my email hmm? Now I get all these random advertisements such as; "oh hey some random deal that you honestly don't care about" and have to clean up my nice little inbox each time. Which happens to usually stay at about 5 items.
That and I would like to see what all this talk is about
4 x 3 40cm guns (wing) (usefulness is debatable, just a prop really)
16 x Mk 45 (possibly lacking)
12 x underwater torpedo (use is debatable, may not be necessary)
At least 32 25mm triple AAA
Toughness and armour:
Armour statistic cannot fall below 910
Toughness statistic must be at least 3.5k
194.5 knots, 194.4 if it displays special performance with good looks
Acceleration must not exceed 2 minutes, same exemplary as above
Engines must be protected well within the vessel, carrier engines are advised. Yamato boiler will be used as an external decoration. Speed tests must be conducted WITHOUT the ornament affixed.
Do not exceed 55m in width (not including potential torpedo protection) or 500m in length (?)
Stability statistic cannot fall below 150, if it does torpedo bulges are acceptable (turret A to B) Bonus mentioning if stability is 200, torpedo bulges are applicable if needed
Will be immediately terminated if stability falls below 100
Armour scheme must be sectioned from turret 1 to 5 and sides are to be of 3 x 2 x 1 protection. Exceptions are fore of turret 1 and aft of turret 5.
Do not use 600mm light weight. It will reduce speed. This is not a battleship!
She must be superior to everything in her category and cannot be heavier than the original Heilstrogen. Which basically means: do not exceed 175,000 t (I think the early figure is 150,000 t, probably the early model of her type)
Oh yes, of course. They are sick of my minor insults that come nothing close to what they say on chat. Rudeness, harassment? So your harassment of Garrett is fine? Oh yes of course it is. "Call others illiterate", only Flamme, in your case, if you cannot tell the difference between might possibly and a definitive term, you may as well not be. Your reading comprehension and bias is a little obvious, not to mention your ignorance of real world realities in many of your arguments. Derp says "intimidating behaviour". Oh yes, I see, so threatening people with blockage if they attempt to make a logical argument. "Why does everyone hate you?" If you go around thinking someone is most definitely a brainless moron who is incapable of the simplest of tasks and then keep feeding rumours and ignore all my attempts to make it easier to understand my manner of speech (which is explained quite nicely on my NC wall), of course everyone will. Even before they interact with the said person. "You were so intimidating to that person on the NC wikia" yea, but I warned him. I also told him what was wrong and what to fix. Flamme, you said arrogant fiends, only problem, you cannot even read what I write correctly most of the time. Almost everyone save a few admins go looking for instances of my "overconfidence". And when you cannot find a good one, you go off and change a word that causes the sentence to be one of clear arrogance. My speech is unusual as the best way to read it, is to go in as if I am apologetic and understand my ships are pieces of trash, as indicated by almost every single fleet review. Wait, make that every fleet review. Anyway, main point, all of you are looking for overconfidence, regardless if it is present or not, and you will only see what you wish to see. You continue to state how worthless my ships are, and really, my own fleet reviews agree...
Example. Kitty accused me of stating that Yukikaze would crush his ships (in chat). What was actually said? I asked kitty how well my ship (Project II) would perform against his BBX 90. He said it would turn out amusingly. Either his memory is focused on bias against me, or you have been feeding kitty a lot of bias.
Example. Massive rage thread. It is present on my BSC wall. If you read it from my side, assuming you knew everything you had was inferior, due to your year long abscence you lack a clear picture on the situation, and ships such as SBY (2012 version) were now obsolete. And when you are temporarily proud (before the fleet review era, also back then I had a bit more "spine") of your new vessel, and try to come off with a joke, the result is certainly negative. Also imagine you are now a bit paranoid of loss of a single advantage. For you are unclear whether you have one or not. You are afraid that new players, or others attempting to enter the field will learn from your outdated vessel, using a lighter version of the 2012 SBY scheme. Which by the way is by no means lacklustre. First you state that there may possibly be better placement options for MK45's, then you say you will not share it, for fear of losing such a small advantage that may not even exist. Then comes the fuel for the fire. If the unfaltering is a good ship, then you have much to do. This is exceedingly simple to reply to. This is not an offensive statement, it is a bit of a venture for information, it is certainly not a definite. If my speech was a bit odd then, it is much more difficult to understand now if you do not go in with the understanding you are inferior. It goes on and on as you attempt to apologize and state it is your fault. But again and again you are ignored. I can imagine many others exploding in fury. But I apologized. Now if any of you would actually read my text the way it is MEANT to be read, you would understand much more. Unfortunately this number is sub 10%.
A lot of my writing is self shaming. I will probably never end this practice. My writing is not always that clear. Ie: "Yukikaze can beat it" means that the vessel is not good enough, considering piece of garbage, scrap pile deserving Yukikaze who is one of the weakest vessels within the BSC wikia can beat it. It is complementing others and shaming myself. Have any of you noticed that?
Prediction: discussion of your ban and insults will increase ban time. If it is true then it is quite believable that you are too unwilling to deal with my arguement. Or just stubbornly sticking onto the "Oicraftian scum" band train.
Now, I haven't read your whole rant because I have better things to do with my life, like, I dunno, study for college classes, but I read enough to know that this thread will turn into a flame war for the simple fact that you like to argue and your current mode and tone, so consider this your final warning before you are banned for an additional two weeks and have the right to comment on your own wall removed. Thank you for cooperating.